Manime: A Code-Driven Visual Teaching Method for Deep Learning Education

Authors

  • R. Raja Subramanian Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education
  • Bharath Inukurthi Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Tamil Nadu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26046

Keywords:

Deep Learning Education; Manim; Multimedia Teaching; Python Animation; Quality Education; Visual Learning

Abstract

This paper introduces Manime, a code-based animation teaching method for deep learning, and compares it to traditional chalk-and-board instruction using statistical analysis. While chalkboard teaching is static, Manime enables instructors to create repeatable, visually rich, and programmatically generated lessons; however, its effectiveness relative to traditional methods has not been systematically evaluated in classroom settings. We compared Manime-style instruction with chalk-and-board lectures in an introductory deep learning course and collected student feedback on comprehension, retention, engagement, and instructional preference. Using paired t-tests, one-sample t-tests, and chi-square tests on data from 60 students who experienced both formats, we found that comprehension improved by +2.77 points after the Manime animation (large effect size, d = 1.25), retention confidence was high (mean 8.28/10, very large effect size, d = 4.99), and engagement significantly favored Manime (Cramér’s V = 0.43), with students also preferring animations for difficult topics (Cramér’s V = 0.30). Students unanimously reported that visuals improved recall, and these findings align with multimedia learning theory and Dual Coding Theory, which suggest that combining visual and verbal channels enhances cognitive processing. Overall, the results indicate that Manime provides an effective and complementary teaching style to traditional chalk-and-board instruction for complex deep learning topics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

Raja Subramanian, R., & Inukurthi, B. (2026). Manime: A Code-Driven Visual Teaching Method for Deep Learning Education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39(Special Issue 2), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39is2/26046

References

3Blue1Brown. (2016). Neural networks [YouTube playlist]. YouTube. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZHQObOWTQDNU6R1_67000Dx_ZCJB-3pi

Barut Tugtekin, E., & Dursun, O. O. (2022). Effect of animated and interactive video variations on learners' motivation in distance education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3247–3276.

Berg, L., Yernaux, G., Vandeloise, M., & Vanhoof, W. (2025). Manim-DFA: Visualising data flow analysis and abstract interpretation algorithms with automated video generation. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU) (pp. 604–611).

Gijsen, M., Catrysse, L., De Maeyer, S., & Gijbels, D. (2024). Mapping cognitive processes in video-based learning by combining trace and think-aloud data. Learning and Instruction, 90, 101851.

Helbling, A., & Chau, D. H. (2023). ManimML: Communicating machine learning architectures with animation. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2306.17108.

Helbling, D., & Chau, D. (2023). MLVis: A high-level animation library for machine learning education. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2305.11099.

Hitron, T., Wald, I., Erel, H., & Zuckerman, O. (2018). Introducing children to machine learning concepts through hands-on experience. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 563–568).

Ji, X., & Zheng, X. (2025). Can pedagogical agents and visual cues enhance students’ deep learning in a virtual reality environment? Insights from multiple data analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 1–23.

Jeyanathan, J. S., P, N., & Nair, A. (2025). Assessment of learning: Student Teams Achievement Division technique for empowering students in problem solving courses. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(2), 107–113).

Mahardhika, I. E. P., Prayitno, H. J., Indri, I., & Fitriyan, M. R. (2025). Visual and contextual learning for deep learning education: A unified tool for theory–practice integration. Journal of Deep Learning, 69–80.

P, N., M, R., Jeyanathan, J. S., & Muneeswaran, V. (2025). Effect of inquiry-based learning on engineering students as collaborative approach in problem-solving and research for formal language automata course. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(2), 23–29.

Riyantoko, P. A., Funabiki, N., Brata, K. C., Mentari, M., Damaliana, A. T., & Prasetya, D. A. (2025). A fundamental statistics self-learning method with Python programming for data science implementations. Information, 16(7), 607.

Roozafzai, Z. S., & Zaeri, P. (2024). Digital dynamics: Exploring the intersection of AI, animation, and personalized learning. i-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1).

Wunderlich, L., Higgins, A., & Lichtenstein, Y. (2021). Machine learning for business students: An experiential learning approach. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 (pp. 512–518).

Yadav, N., & DeBello, J. E. (2019). Recommended practices for Python pedagogy in graduate data science courses. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.

Yu, T. (2025). Design description of Wisdom Computing Perspective. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2505.03800.

Zhou, H., Tang, A., & Chan, S. H. (2024). Manimator: Text-to-animation generation using large language models and Manim. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2403.06732.

Jeyanathan, J. S., P, N., & Nair, A. (2025). Assessment of Learning: Student Teams Achievement Division Technique for Empowering Students in Problem-Solving Courses. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(2), 107–113.

P, N., M, R., Jeyanathan, J. S., & Muneeswaran, V. (2025). Effect of Inquiry-based Learning on Engineering Students as Collaborative Approach in Problem-Solving and Research for Formal Language Automata Course. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(2), 23–29.