Personalized and Collaborative Learning Approach for Enhanced Student Engagement

Authors

  • Arun C. Dixit Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering, Karnataka
  • Harshavardhan B. The National Institute of Engineering, Mysuru, Karnataka
  • Prakasha K. N. Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering, Mysuru, Karnataka
  • Ashok B. C. Vidyavardhaka College of Engineering, Mysuru, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39i3/26091

Keywords:

Personalized Learning, Engineering Education, Collaborative Learning, Learning Styles, Hackathon.

Abstract

This paper examines the implementation of personalized learning strategies in the "Theory of Machines" course for mechanical engineering students, aimed at addressing diverse learning preferences often overlooked in traditional teaching methods. A survey conducted at the beginning of the semester identified students’ preferred learning styles, including Visual, Aural, Kinesthetic, and Read/Write. Tailored activities, designed using freely available online tools, were introduced to align with these preferences, ensuring students engaged with the content in a manner that best supported their individual learning styles. Engagement metrics and pre- and post-activity surveys indicated improved participation and self-assessed understanding across all learner types. To further extend learning beyond individual preferences, a collaborative hackathon was organized at the end of the course. Diverse teams, composed of students with different learning styles, worked together to simulate real-world engineering collaboration. This interdisciplinary teamwork allowed students to contribute based on their strengths while learning new approaches from their peers. The hackathon results demonstrated that peer learning significantly enhanced students’ problem-solving abilities and communication skills. This study underscores the effectiveness of combining personalized learning with collaborative projects in engineering education. By addressing individual learning needs and fostering teamwork, students were better prepared for the demands of professional engineering environments. The findings suggest that this model is scalable to other technical courses and has the potential to reshape engineering curricula to be more inclusive and dynamic. Future research should explore the long-term impacts on student outcomes and the integration of emerging technologies, such as virtual reality, to further enrich the learning experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-29

How to Cite

Dixit, A. C., B., H., K. N., P., & B. C., A. (2026). Personalized and Collaborative Learning Approach for Enhanced Student Engagement. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 39(3), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39i3/26091

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Ang, K. C. S., Afzal, F., & Crawford, L. H. (2021). Transitioning from passive to active learning: Preparing future project leaders. Project Leadership and Society, 2, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100016

Bondie, R. S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How Does Changing “One-Size-Fits-All” to Differentiated Instruction Affect Teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336–362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821130

Børte, K., & Lillejord, S. (2024). Learning to teach: Aligning pedagogy and technology in a learning design tool. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, 104693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104693

Cuevas, J. (2015). Is learning styles-based instruction effective? A comprehensive analysis of recent research on learning styles. Theory and Research in Education, 13(3), 308–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515606621

Dixit, A. C., Achutha, M. V., & Sridhara, B. K. (2020). Elastic properties of aluminum boron carbide metal matrix composites. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.766

Dixit, A. C., Harshavardhan, B., Shivashankar, R., Gururaja, S., & Vismay, K. G. (2021). Effect of dry sliding wear parameters on the tribological behavior of aluminum hybrid metal matrix composites. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.113

Dixit, A. C., K N, P., B, H., & A, A. (2025). Hackathon-Based Learning Approaches for Mechanical Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(IS2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2025/v38is2/25028

Dixit, A. C., Prakasha, K. N., B, H., A, A., & Taranum, A. (2025). Barriers to Integrating AI in Curriculum for Enhanced Engineering Education: A Fuzzy ISM Approach. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(IS2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2025/v38is2/25017

Dixit, A. C., Sridhara, B. K., & Achutha, M. V. (2019). Evaluation of Critical Speed for Aluminum–Boron Carbide Metal Matrix Composite Shaft. In U. Chandrasekhar, L.-J. Yang, & S. Gowthaman (Eds.), Innovative Design, Analysis and Development Practices in Aerospace and Automotive Engineering (I-DAD 2018) (pp. 527–534). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2718-6_51

Dixit, Arun C, B, Harshavardhan, B C, Ashok, K N, Prakasha, M A, S., & K N, P. (2024). Innovative Pedagogical Approaches for Diverse Learning Styles and Student Centric Learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(IS2), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v37is2/24039

Gaur, V., Bhangalia, A., Singhal, S., & Kaur, R. (2024). A Smart Learning Management System for Virtual Labs. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(1), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v38i1/24184

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Harshavardhan, B., Ravishankar, R., Suresha, B., Srinivas, S., & Arun C. Dixit, U. (2020). Thermal characterization of polyethersulfone composites filled with self lubricants. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.768

Kabilan, S. J. (2023). Teaching and Learning in the Metaverse World: The Future of New-Gen Education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(1), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v37i1/23139

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x

Liu, T., Yu, X., Liu, M., Wang, M., Zhu, X., & Yang, X. (2021). A mixed method evaluation of an integrated course in improving critical thinking and creative self-efficacy among nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 106, 105067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105067

Lyle, K. B., Young, A. S., Heyden, R. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (2023). Matching learning style to instructional format penalizes learning. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100143

Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2024). How personalized and effective is immersive virtual reality in education? A systematic literature review for the last decade. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83(6), 18185–18233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15986-7

Mehta, Dr. M., & Mehta, N. (2023). Impact of Experiential Learning on Learning Outcomes Among Engineering Students Based on Kolb’s Model: A Netnography Study. Journal Transformations, of Engineering 37(2), Education 51–59. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v37i2/23149

Othman, N., & Amiruddin, M. H. (2010). Different Perspectives of Learning Styles from VARK Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 652-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.088

Parvathi, M. (2021). Activity Based Analysis and Prediction Strategy for the Class Room Performance Improvement. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(0), 686. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157167

Patil, M. S., & Kamerikar, U. A. (2020). Learning by Doing through Project Based Active Learning Technique. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 33(0), 125. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/150080

Rajalingam, S., Kanagamalliga, S., Karuppiah, N., & Puoza, J. C. (2021). Peer Interaction Teaching-Learning Approaches for Effective Engagement of Students in Virtual Classroom. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(0), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157191

Raravi, P., & Madhusudan, H. K. (2017). Enhancing Constructive Learning by Integrating Theory and Practice. Journal Transformations, of Engineering Education 30(3). https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2017/v30i3/110611

Reddy, S. N., Pathlavath, M., Narsareddygari, S., & Naik, S. M. (2024). Investigating The Transformative Effects of Active Learning Methodologies in The Field of Engineering Education to Improve Learning Outcomes in Students by Unleashing Their Potential. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(IS2), 562–567. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v37is2/24088

Rennick, C., Litster, G., Hulls, C. C. W., & Hurst, A. (2023). Curricular Hackathons for Engineering Design Learning: The Case of Engineering Design Days. IEEE Transactions on Education, 66(6), 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3295754

Sharma, A., Hemanth, P. B., Bhavani, A., & Dixit, A. C. (2023). Green Hydrogen for a Sustainable Future: Prospects and Challenges for Energy-Based Applications in Major Indian States by 2030. E3S Web of Conferences, 405, 02027. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340502027

Sukackė, V., Guerra, A. O. P. de C., Ellinger, D., Carlos, V., Petronienė, S., Gaižiūnienė, L., Blanch, S., Marbà-Tallada, A., & Brose, A. (2022). Towards Active Evidence-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability, 14(21), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113955

Tulsi, P. K., Poonia, M. P., & Priya, A. (2016). Learning Styles of Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2016/v30i2/105438

Upadhye, Dr. V., Madhe, Dr. S., & Joshi, Dr. A. (2022). Project Based Learning as an Active Learning Strategy in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(S1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v36is1/22169

Villegas-Ch, W., & García-Ortiz, J. (2023). Enhancing Learning Personalization in Educational Environments through Ontology-Based Knowledge Representation. Computers, 12(10), 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12100199

Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020). Appraising research on personalized learning: Definitions, theoretical alignment, advancements, and future directions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1747757

Yotta, E. G. (2023). Accommodating students’ learning styles differences in English language classroom. Heliyon, 9(6), e17497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17497

Zhang, W., Guan, Y., & Hu, Z. (2024). The efficacy of project-based learning in enhancing computational thinking among students: A meta-analysis of 31 experiments and quasi-experiments. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 14513–14545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12392-2