Bridging the Industry–Academia Gap Through Experiential Learning in Analog Electronics Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2026/v39i4/26103Keywords:
Active learning, Analog electronics, Design project, Effective assessment, Engineering Education, Experiential learningAbstract
Experiential learning in the area of Electronics and Communication Engineering Education provides a hands-on approach that fosters active engagement and practical skill development among students. This TLP methodology emphasizes learning through practical implementation of realworld applications, enabling students to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and application. In this work, the experiential learning methodology adopted for the third-semester Electronics and Communication Engineering students for the core subject Analog Electronics is detailed. The pre-requisite for this course is Basic Electronics in which students were trained to design and analyze the basic circuits with certain exposure to practical learning. Students pursuing Electronics and Communication engineering often encounter various challenges in comprehending the subject matter. Analog electronics involves abstract concepts such as amplifiers, filters, oscillators and semiconductor devices, which can be challenging for them to grasp without hands-on experience. The theoretical foundation of Analog electronics often involves complex mathematical analysis, including differential equations, Fourier analysis, and Laplace transforms, which can be daunting for students. Students may struggle to understand the practical relevance and real-world applications of theory concepts, leading to a lack of motivation and engagement. Troubleshooting and debugging analog circuits require a deep understanding of the underlying principles and students may face difficulties in identifying and rectifying errors. Addressing these challenges through experiential learning and practical implementation can greatly enhance students' understanding of the fundamental course Analog electronics.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Teaching Engineering, Second Edition Phillip C. Wankat Purdue University Frank S. Oreovicz Purdue University
Heywood, J. (2005). Engineering education: Research and development in curriculum and instruction. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press
Pomales-García. C., & Liu, Y. (2007). Excellence in engineering education: Views of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 253–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00934.x
Svinicki, M. D., & McKeachie, W. J. (2014). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research and theory for college and university teachers (14th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Gray, T., & Madson, L. (2007). Ten easy ways to engage your students. College Teaching, 55(2), 83–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.55.2.83-87
Hyman, R. T. (1982). Questioning in the college classroom (Idea Paper No. 8). Manhattan: Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University.
Daly, S. R., Finelli, C., Al-Khafaji, A. B., & Neubauer, M. J. (2012). Student perspective of faculty classroom practices. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference (Session 2012- 3208). Washington, DC: ASEE.
Borns, R. J. (1989). Professional guest lecturers. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference (Session 168). Washington, DC: ASEE.
Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education: Part 2. Teaching methods that work. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 26–39.
Prince, M. J. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2004.tb00809.x
Bloom, B. S. (1968, May). Learning for instruction. Evaluation Comment, University of California, Los Angeles (2). Also RELCV topical paper and reprint no. 1.
Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410- 8415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Lang, J. (2013). Cheating lessons: Learning from academic dishonesty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Davis, B. G. (2009). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Du, X., De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (eds.). (2009). Research on PBL practice in engineering education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Goldstein, H. (1982). Learning through cooperative groups. Engineering Education, 73(2), 171–174.
Jones, J. B. (1991). Design at the frontiers of engineering education. Proceedings of the ASEE/ IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (Session 107). New York: IEEE.
Maryam J.(2024) Recruiting Trends in the Post- PandemicTech Industry[Blog post] retrieved from
https://datapeople.io/article/recruiting-trends-post-pandemic tech-industry/
Nikita Duggal (2024) 24 New Technology Trends in 2024: Exploring the Future [Blog post] retrieved from https://www.simplilearn.com/top-technology-trends-and-jobs-article
Arman, A. (2019). The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning Method on Students’ Achievement in An Analog Electronics Course at Palestine Polytechnic University. http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/8112
Podges, J. M., Kommers, P. A. M., Winnips, K., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2014). Mixing problem based learning and conventional teaching methods in an analog electronics course. American journal of engineering education, 5(2), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v5i2.8973
Fang, J., Zhao, S., Shang, L., Zhou, X., & Zhang, C. (2017, November). Application of project-based learning in analog electronic technology course. In International Conference on Education Innovation and Social Science (ICEISS 2017) (pp. 130-133). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iceiss-17.2017.32
Mohd-Yasin, F. (2021). Effective Strategies for Project-Based Learning of Practical Electronics. Electronics, 10(18), 2245. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10182245
Yang, X. (2021). An approach of project-based learning: Bridging the gap between academia and industry needs in teaching integrated circuit design course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(4), 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3050450
Hussain, A. A., El-Nakla, S., Khan, A. H., Nayfeh, J., Ifurong, A., & Tayem, N. (2024, December). Project-Based Learning Approach for Undergraduate Electrical Engineering Laboratories: A Case Study. In 2024 6th International Symposium on Advanced Electrical and Communication Technologies (ISAECT) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAECT64333.2024.1079987 6
Escribano, L., Tainta, S., & Erro, M. J. (2024, June). Analog electronics projects to encourage active learning. In 2024 XVI Congreso de Tecnología, Aprendizaje y Enseñanza de la Electrónica (TAEE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAEE59541.2024.10605000
Kataria, D., Sanchez, G., & Govindasamy, S. (2024). Fundamentals of Automation Engineering: A hybrid project-based learning approach. International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 61(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720920928460
Jayachandran, R., & Hegde, S. (2026). From Theory to Practice: Experiential Learning in Analog Electronic Circuits Lab. IEEE Transactions on Education, 69(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2026.3664177
Access to login into the old portal (Manuscript Communicator) for Peer Review-

